For months
and months, the Air Force Association has been beating the drum about our aging
force. I, for one, can see the picture clearly. You can’t build an
Air Force overnight. It takes years of sustained investment to build and
train the force to the cutting edge. And … simply put, we have taken our
Air Force for granted.
Yesterday
two articles came out that highlighted these points. The first, in the
Weekly Standard, was by Michael Auslin. In it Mr. Auslin makes the point
that the new strategy makes the United States more dependent on Airpower … and
this at a time when most of the budget cuts are on the Air Force. He
further points out that our potential adversaries are learning. They are
fielding better defenses and more advanced aircraft. He concludes with
the following:
“Warfighting is becoming
more risky as authoritarian regimes modernize their forces. If the United
States wants to retain the ability to respond successfully to crises across the
globe with a leaner and more cost-effective force, then our leaders must
recognize that maintaining control of the air is the starting point for U.S.
military supremacy.”
Secondly,
Congressman Randy Forbes (R-VA) has a piece in Politico that raises the clarion
call for the Air Force. He references an article in Air Force Magazine to
point out that no US soldier, sailor, or marine has been killed by enemy
airplanes in nearly six decades. He likens Airpower to oxygen: “You
don’t notice it until it starts disappearing.” He further states:
“The Air Force provides
the central ingredient for nearly all military operations: real-time
intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance; cybernetworking; battle-space
air control; strategic airlift and medical evacuation; full-spectrum bombing;
and combat air support, among other capabilities.”
He notes
the centrality of Airpower to our ability to conduct military operations:
“Given the importance of
air dominance to our strategy, we must reverse the deterioration of the Air
Force or face the likely scenario in which we won’t have enough air assets to
do the job of protecting U.S. interests and defending allies.”
You can
find these pieces at: http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/flying-not-quite-high_642187.html and
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=CA536D11-D6B8-48E4-9B5C-BF16DFB6A8A5
We need
more voices like these two …
For your
consideration.
Mike
Michael M. Dunn
President/CEO
Air Force Association
"The only thing more expensive than a
first-rate Air Force is … a second-rate Air Force." -- Senate
staff member
Michael M. Dunn
President/CEO
Air Force Association
2 comments:
February 15, 1964 a North Vietnamese fighter (T-28) shot down a USAF C-123.
We should also be talking about the personnel and training issues that is unique to airpower. There are no more 22 year olds being born. There is a shrinking ANG to harvest USAF skilled labor for further surge.
We are headed in the wrong direction.
edit...change "is" to "are"....
Post a Comment