Only every now and then does one run across an
article that
completely
lays out an issue … and in as few words as possible explains it to the public.
An example of one is entitled: “Why the US Wants a New Bomber.” It was
written by David Axe and appeared in The Diplomat … but it is essentially
an interview with Lt General (Ret) David Deptula. Gen Deptula, himself a
fighter pilot, lays out the case for why … the United States … not the Air
Force … or the Department of Defense … but the United States needs a new bomber.
There are lots of pithy quotes from the piece. Here are a
couple to interest you.
“The U.S. Office of Management and Budget recently stated that
existing bombers are adequate for projected missions over the long term. Did
that change? Or did the Defense Department have to convince OMB that current
bombers aren’t adequate?
The
OMB statement was actually something of an anomaly: OMB has no military
competence and shouldn’t be attributed any. [The Office of the Secretary of
Defense] and the Air Force consistently indicated from 2006 to 2009 that the
Air Force needed a new bomber, and then did so [again] from April 2009 through
today.
DoD
reasoning was that the B-1 and B-52 are aging and non-stealthy and the B-2,
while stealthy, is only available in small numbers.”
“Why not just upgrade existing bombers
to meet future threats? What will the new bomber do that old, upgraded bombers
can't?
The
Air Force currently operates three types of bombers: the B-52H, the B-1B and
the B-2A. Design of the B-52 began in the late 1940s and the last one was
delivered in 1962. It has been upgraded many times and has excellent range and
payload. However, no amount of updating can alter the fundamental
characteristics of the aircraft – like its shape and resulting large radar
signature – that make it relatively easy to detect and very vulnerable to air defenses
of even modest sophistication. …
The
B-1’s design dates from the 1970s and they were built in the late 1980s. They
have also been modified many times over the past 25 years and are more
survivable than the B-52s, but again their design characteristics place
fundamental limits on how much upgraded sub-systems can extend their ability to
penetrate advanced air defenses. Thus, B-52s will increasingly be used in the
stand-off weapon-delivery role, and exclusively so in operations against
well-defended adversaries.
The
B-2 stealth bomber was developed in the 1980s and the last was delivered in the
late 1990s. They were designed to penetrate advanced air-defense systems and
are the only Air Force bombers capable of survivably delivering large weapons –
or large numbers of smaller weapons – in a non-permissive air environment.
However,
the Air Force has only 20 B-2s, roughly one-fifth of what’s generally regarded
as the minimum-required stealth bomber force for major air campaigns in either
East Asia or Southwest Asia – and remember, the new defense strategy calls for
global strike forces capable of conducting two such campaigns concurrently. As
our adversaries adapt to known U.S. military strengths by acquiring more
advanced air defenses, mobile systems or hardening important targets the
capacity of the B-2 fleet will fall ever further behind the demand for its
capabilities.
In
other words, the new bomber will restore a balance between Air Force bomber
capabilities, capacities and demands.”
For your consideration.
Mike
Michael M. Dunn
President/CEO
Air Force Association
"The only thing more expensive than a
first-rate Air Force is … a second-rate Air Force." -- Senate
staff member